Capacity development: Research rooted in community partner voice Patrick Green, Director of Experiential Learning & Clinical Instructor of Experiential Learning, Loyola University Chicago [pgreen@luc.edu]
Travis Proffitt, Community Partnerships Coordinator, Loyola University Chicago [tproffi@luc.edu]
Keywords: Capacity development, reciprocity, community partner voice
Conference track: Community partnerships and outcomes
Format: Research/Scholarly paper
Summary Community organizations partnering with higher education institutions depend upon structured pathways to express both their needs and assets. A study of the impact of community partnerships communicates how organizational capacity was enhanced through the work of students in a variety of community-based learning curricular programs.
The literature on community partnerships in community-engaged learning in higher education has consistently focused on reciprocity (Jacoby, 1996; Jacoby, 2003; Schiebel, Bowley, & Jones, 2005). The question of actual “reciprocity” and the mutual benefits for community partners has been called into question as well (Stoecker & Tryon, 2009). How does the voice of the community partner organization become structurally embedded into the partnership to identify the organization’s own capacity development? This research addresses the structural implementation of community voice in community partnership development through a center for experiential learning and multiple community-engaged learning programs.
Through a survey, focus groups, and semi-structured interviews, data was collected on the organizational capacity developed through community-engaged programs as well as strategies to further address community needs through partnership with higher education institutions. Data was analyzed through categorization to identify themes of community partner organization capacity development and growth strategies.
The analysis of data demonstrated significant themes of capacity development, including:
Increased number of beneficiaries served
Improved service utilization by beneficiaries
Developed new and expanded preexisting programs and services
Gained collaborative partnerships with other community organizations
Diminished cost to community
Strategies for further addressing reciprocity through the development of organizational priorities included:
Increase community-based research projects
Connect with more research faculty
Develop multiple points of connection with the college or university
This study contributes to the practice and development of structures to support reciprocity in community relationships with higher education programs. These results translate into practical implications for structuring educational programs that facilitate community partnerships.
References Jacoby, B. (1996). Service-Learning in Today's Higher Education. In B. Jacoby (Ed.), Service-learning in higher education: Concepts and practices. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Jacoby, B. (2003). Fundamentals of service-learning partnerships. In B. Jacoby (Ed.), Building partnerships for service-learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Scheibel, J., Bowley, E. M., & Jones, S. (2005). The promise of partnerships: Tapping into the college as a community asset. Providence, RI: Campus Compact.
Stoecker, R., & Tryon, E. A. (Eds). (2009). The unheard voices: Community organizations and service learning. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
To access materials from this session please click on the file link(s) below:
Capacity development: Research rooted in community partner voice
Patrick Green, Director of Experiential Learning & Clinical Instructor of Experiential Learning, Loyola University Chicago [pgreen@luc.edu]
Travis Proffitt, Community Partnerships Coordinator, Loyola University Chicago [tproffi@luc.edu]
Keywords: Capacity development, reciprocity, community partner voice
Conference track: Community partnerships and outcomes
Format: Research/Scholarly paper
Summary
Community organizations partnering with higher education institutions depend upon structured pathways to express both their needs and assets. A study of the impact of community partnerships communicates how organizational capacity was enhanced through the work of students in a variety of community-based learning curricular programs.
The literature on community partnerships in community-engaged learning in higher education has consistently focused on reciprocity (Jacoby, 1996; Jacoby, 2003; Schiebel, Bowley, & Jones, 2005). The question of actual “reciprocity” and the mutual benefits for community partners has been called into question as well (Stoecker & Tryon, 2009). How does the voice of the community partner organization become structurally embedded into the partnership to identify the organization’s own capacity development? This research addresses the structural implementation of community voice in community partnership development through a center for experiential learning and multiple community-engaged learning programs.
Through a survey, focus groups, and semi-structured interviews, data was collected on the organizational capacity developed through community-engaged programs as well as strategies to further address community needs through partnership with higher education institutions. Data was analyzed through categorization to identify themes of community partner organization capacity development and growth strategies.
The analysis of data demonstrated significant themes of capacity development, including:
Strategies for further addressing reciprocity through the development of organizational priorities included:
This study contributes to the practice and development of structures to support reciprocity in community relationships with higher education programs. These results translate into practical implications for structuring educational programs that facilitate community partnerships.
References
Jacoby, B. (1996). Service-Learning in Today's Higher Education. In B. Jacoby (Ed.), Service-learning in higher education: Concepts and practices. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Jacoby, B. (2003). Fundamentals of service-learning partnerships. In B. Jacoby (Ed.), Building partnerships for service-learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Scheibel, J., Bowley, E. M., & Jones, S. (2005). The promise of partnerships: Tapping into the college as a community asset. Providence, RI: Campus Compact.
Stoecker, R., & Tryon, E. A. (Eds). (2009). The unheard voices: Community organizations and service learning. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
To access materials from this session please click on the file link(s) below: